InkaInka

    Upgrade to unlock industry intelligence

    You're out of credits.

    • Full compliance audits
    • 200 AI credits/month
    • Counter-Argument Predictor
    • Language refinement
    0 credits left
    Free

    Inka chat costs from 1 credit, based on the length of the answer.

    Contract Review · Powered by Claude Opus 4.8

    Catch the clause that costs you.

    Upload a .docx. We review every clause for enforceability under Indian contract law, flag liability caps, IP indemnity, termination, restraint-of-trade and DPDP compliance gaps, and surface the protections your draft is missing. Every finding is grounded in a verified statute or judgment — or we refuse to make it.

    Liability caps & indemnityIP & moral-rights waiversTermination & restraint-of-tradeDPDP & stamp-duty gapsVerified Indian-law citations

    3-day trial · 50 AI credits · No credit card required

    Coverage

    What Contract Review checks

    • Restraint-of-trade / non-compete clauses void under Section 27, Indian Contract Act 1872 (post-employment and post-term restraints).
    • Penalty clauses dressed as liquidated damages, read down under Section 74, Indian Contract Act 1872 — compensation is capped and must be proved.
    • Exclusive-jurisdiction clauses and unlawful ouster of statutory or regulatory forums under Section 28, Indian Contract Act 1872.
    • Arbitration seat-versus-venue defects that decide which court supervises the arbitration.
    • Stamp-duty admissibility under Section 35, Indian Stamp Act 1899 (a curable defect, not fatal).
    • Indemnity scope under Sections 124–125, Indian Contract Act 1872.
    • Delayed-payment terms tested against the 45-day rule under the MSMED Act 2006.
    • Assignment of work product and waiver of moral rights under the Copyright Act 1957.

    Trust

    Grounded, or withheld — never fabricated

    Every flag is anchored to a verified statute section or a Supreme Court / High Court judgment; anything the system cannot ground in verified Indian law is withheld and shown transparently, never invented. This is the difference from general-purpose AI that hallucinates citations.

    Audience

    Built for

    Corporate legal teams, AIF / PE / real-estate fund managers, law firms, and CA firms reviewing vendor, investment, employment and services agreements.

    Common questions

    Frequently asked questions

    What file formats can I upload?

    Word .docx, so the review comes back as a native tracked-changes redline you can accept or reject in Microsoft Word.

    Does LegalInk give legal advice?

    No. It flags enforceability issues grounded in Indian law for your review — LegalInk flags, advocates advise.

    Which laws does it apply?

    Indian law: the Indian Contract Act 1872, Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, Indian Stamp Act 1899, MSMED Act 2006, Copyright Act 1957, and more.

    How is this different from using a general AI chatbot to review a contract?

    Every flag is anchored to a verified statute or judgment, and the system refuses to raise any issue it cannot ground — it does not fabricate section numbers or case citations.

    Is my contract confidential?

    Your document is processed in your browser and is never stored on our servers; only the clause text needed for analysis is sent, and we never train any model on your content.

    Prefer Dark Mode? 🌙